首页> 外文OA文献 >Reconstruction of peri-implant osseous defects : a multicenter randomized trial
【2h】

Reconstruction of peri-implant osseous defects : a multicenter randomized trial

机译:种植体周围骨缺损的重建:一项多中心随机试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There is a paucity of data for the effectiveness of reconstructive procedures in the treatment of peri-implantitis. The objective of this study was to compare reconstruction of peri-implant osseous defects with open flap debridement (OFD) plus porous titanium granules (PTGs) compared with OFD alone. Sixty-three patients (36 female, 27 male; mean age 58.4 y [SD 12.3]), contributing one circumferential peri-implant intraosseous defect, were included in a multinational, multicenter randomized trial using a parallel-group design. After OFD and surface decontamination using titanium brushes and hydrogen peroxide, 33 defects received PTGs. The implants were not submerged. All patients received adjunctive perioperative systemic antibiotics. The primary outcome variable (defect fill) was assessed on digitalized radiographs. Clinical measurements of probing depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BoP), suppuration, and plaque were taken by blinded examiners. After 12 mo, the test group (OFD plus PTG) showed a mean radiographic defect fill (mesial/distal) of 3.6/3.6 mm compared with 1.1/1.0 in the control group (OFD). Differences were statistically significant in favor of the test group (P < 0.0001). The OFD plus PTG group showed a mean reduction in PPD of 2.8 mm compared with 2.6 mm in the OFD group. BoP was reduced from 89.4% to 33.3% and from 85.8% to 40.4% for the test and control groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in complete resolution of peri-implantitis (PPD ≤4 mm and no BoP at six implant sites and no further bone loss), because this finding was accomplished at 30% of implants in the test group and 23% of implants in the control group. Reconstructive surgery using PTGs resulted in significantly enhanced radiographic defect fill compared with OFD. However, limitations in the lack of ability to discern biomaterial from osseous tissue could not be verified to determine new bone formation. Similar improvements according to clinical measures were obtained after both surgical treatment modalities (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02406001).
机译:重建手术治疗种植体周围炎的有效性的数据很少。这项研究的目的是比较与开放式清创术(OFD)加上多孔钛颗粒(PTGs)与单独的OFD相比种植体周围骨缺损的重建情况。一项采用平行组设计的多国,多中心随机试验纳入了63名患者(其中1名女性,男27名;平均年龄58.4岁,平均年龄[SD 12.3]),其造成了一个种植体周围周骨内骨缺损。在使用钛刷和过氧化氢对OFD进行表面消毒后,获得了33个PTG。植入物没有被淹没。所有患者均接受辅助围手术期全身性抗生素治疗。主要结果变量(缺陷填充)在数字化射线照片上评估。盲法检查者对探测深度(PPD),探测出血(BoP),化脓和斑块进行了临床测量。 12个月后,测试组(OFD加PTG)的平均放射线缺损(中/远)为3.6 / 3.6 mm,而对照组(OFD)为1.1 / 1.0。差异有统计学意义,有利于测试组(P <0.0001)。 OFD加PTG组显示PPD平均降低2.8 mm,而OFD组为2.6 mm。测试组和对照组的BoP分别从89.4%降低到33.3%,从85.8%降低到40.4%。种植体周围炎的完全缓解率没有明显差异(PPD≤4mm,六个种植体部位没有BoP,并且没有进一步的骨质流失),因为这一发现是在测试组的30%的种植体和23%的种植体中完成的在对照组中。与OFD相比,使用PTG进行的重建手术显着增强了X线片的缺损。但是,无法从骨组织识别生物材料的能力方面的局限性无法确定新的骨形成。在两种手术治疗方式之后,都根据临床措施获得了类似的改善(ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02406001)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号